Broad industry coalition calls upon EU decision makers to ACT NOW  to ensure a genuine digital level-playing field for remote access to in-vehicle data. Competition, innovation and consumer interests must be at the heart of the EU Digital Single Market.

 

The undersigned coalition of automotive industry and mobility services operators, insurers, motorist consumers and SME representatives are united in their concern that effective competition, innovation, and free consumer choice are currently not being placed at the centre of the discussions around technical solutions to fair and equal access to in-vehicle data and functions remotely.

 

Press Release

 

 

This requires three key abilities:

 

This interoperable access will allow the development of new competitive digital products and services, which will result in true choice for consumers.

 

However, all these three capabilities would not be possible with the model  put forward by vehicle manufacturers, the so-called ‘Extended Vehicle’. It merely channels all future communication and data access through the vehicle manufacturer’s proprietary backend server. Only part of the data generated by the vehicle would be sent to independent service providers, either directly or via a B2B ‘neutral’ server platform (the “NEVADA” concept).

 

Initial ‘reality’ checks of ExVe have shown that it does not allow direct and real-time communication with the vehicle/the functions/the driver, which is increasingly needed for time-critical operations or prognostics and as an asset in improving road safety and fostering the ‘green digital economy’.  Instead,  it gives vehicle manufacturers full control to decide arbitrarily how, when and to whom (mainly aggregated and already diagnosed/processed) data access will be granted.

 

As such, ‘Extended Vehicle/NEVADA’ would prevent all other service providers ‘around the car’ from offering competing services to consumers, as consumers are only able to authorise a small part of their vehicle generated data to be shared with independent service providers, compared to the data available to the vehicle manufacturers. Additionally, the latency, cost and contractual conditions imposed by ExVe further limits competing services.

 

 

Fact: Many automobile manufacturers already allow selected third parties to operate their own systems and applications in their vehicles today. This demonstrates that safe and secure direct access is possible without interfering with the vehicle’s functions.

 

 

It is crucial to start the work now so that a solution is in place when the magnitude of connected vehicles, fostered by the introduction of eCall, will hit the automotive service and mobility markets in a few years. This is what the European Parliament had in mind in March when it adopted the EP TRAN Committee Report on Cooperative Intelligent Transport System (C-ITS), which calls on the European Commission to publish a legislative proposal on access to in-vehicle data and resources by the end of the year.

 

2. Direct real-time access to in-vehicle generated data and functions through an in-vehicle interoperable, standardised, secure and open-access platform for remote bi-directional communication with the 3rd party service provider.

3. The scope and quality of the data/functionalities shall be at least the same as the vehicle manufacturers uses for its own remote services.

4. Access to the vehicle display and/or voice commands must be established to enable direct safe communication with the driver.

5. No monitoring by the vehicle manufacturer of the data and communication used by independent applications.

 

As a further concrete step we call upon the Commission to adopt a sound definition of Remote Diagnostic Support…

 

Following the adoption of the new Vehicle Type-Approval Regulation, Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs (DG GROW) started discussions with independent operators and vehicle manufacturers to define Remote Diagnostic Support (RDS) in greater detail. In this context, we call upon the European Commission to make sure that the definition of RDS allows us to remotely communicate bi-directionally and directly with the vehicle via a standardised in-vehicle interface to conduct a remote diagnostics analysis and support communication with the driver. We strongly refute attempts by the vehicle manufacturers to have their anti-competitive Extended Vehicle concept being enshrined into EU legislation (by referencing ISO 20080 which is based on Extended Vehicle).

 

 

In the shorter term and to ensure a basic “right to do business”  with some basic abilities to access the vehicle and its data for independent operators within the whole automotive supply chain, we propose an ‘interim solution’:

 

“Vehicle manufacturers shall provide as from 1.1.2020 non-discriminatory access for independent service providers to the in-vehicle telematics systems as used by themselves, and to those in-vehicle systems and interfaces which they grant to other third party service providers for access to in-vehicle generated data and in-vehicle functions in terms of data depth, quality and functionality. Independent service providers shall respect the security and safety access specifications as set by the vehicle manufacturer for its own in-vehicle telematics system or as used for existing third parties”.